Social acceptability of climate change policies; will energy efficiency always fail to win its case through the consultation process?

Panel: Panel 1: The foundations of a future energy policy. Longer term strategies

Author:
Jacky Pett, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research

Abstract

Which segments of society ‘win’ as a result of climate change policies? Actors generally support the principle of reduced emissions through decarbonising fuels, and many are convinced that reducing overall energy consumption is an essential strategy to prevent further damaging climate change. However, proposed strategies for ensuring that sufficient action is taken to reduce emissions suffer from complexity, uncertainty and dissent, especially from vested interests. The policy maker has to choose between many options, and many conflicting consultation responses, to select the most politically feasible and socially acceptable pathway.

An FP6 funded project into Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies for climate change is developing an innovative tool to support policy choice based on a mix of methods, using case studies to test the outputs. Resources include stakeholder deliberation on criteria necessary to evaluate pathway options. The first stage maps energy actors’ perspectives of climate change, identifying key issues for socially acceptable policies for the 2012 – 2050 period that would either limit climate change to only 2°C increase, or provide a ‘soft landing’ to a world 5 degrees above present.

This paper describes this mapping exercise and indicates the issues of most debate, on which rest the criteria for social acceptability. It describes how deliberative methods can involve stakeholders more effectively in policy formation, contrasts the roles of deliberation and consultation, and discusses the engagement of powerful vested interests with this approach. While there are considerable overlaps in perspectives of different actors, leading to specific points of contention, importantly, decisions on selection and engagement of stakeholders with the process become critical if the criteria for policy decisions are to be accepted by society.